Grapes Of Wrath And Of Mice And Men: Character Study :: essays research papers

Grapes of petulance and Of Mice and manpower Character Study     The American Novelist, washstand Steinbeck was a powerful writer of dramaticstories about good versus bad. His ingest views on writing were that non onlyshould a writer restore the twaddle sound good but also the reputation written shouldteach a lesson. In position, Steinbeck focused more of his novels, not on averageliterary themes rather he tended to relay messages about the many big(a) truths oflife in The United States. Upon winning the Nobel Peace lever in 1962 theSwedish academy introduced him by maintaining "He had no mind to be an un glumendingcomforter and entertainer. Instead, the topics he chose were serious and comminatory" This serious focus was not exempt from his two works "The Grapesof Wrath" and "Of Mice and Men". "The Grapes of Wrath" has been recognized bymany as "the greatest novel in American Hi horizontal surface" and it rem ains among thearchetypes of American culture. Although "Of Mice and Men" may not havereceived as much pompousness as the other it is still a great classic that was belatedly made into a motion picture.     The focus of "The Grapes of Wrath" Is one family, the Joads, who hasbeen kicked off their Oklahoma farm and forced to move to California to look forwork. The story has historical significance as it is true that many familieswere forced, in the equivalent way as the Joads, to leave their homes to look forwork during the depression. It is in this fact that one can see how Steinbecksintention in "The grapes of Wrath" was to submit the hardships people wentthrough during an actual event in American history. mayhap the most solemnmessage in this novel was the poor treatment of the dispossessed families asthey reached California. In "Of Mice and Men" the reader is presented with astory that takes place in the same setting of "T he Grapes of Wrath" This story exposit the hardships of two traveling companions while they be working at aranch in California.     The common thread between these two novels is not necessarily the plotor the setting rather, it is the way in which Steinbeck relays his message.That is to say that, although both novels carry different story lines they bothportray hard truths about human suffering. Steinbeck reveals these truthsthrough his depiction of characters. In each story it seems that the characterswere crafted by Steinbeck in a bias manner so as to emphasize the overallmessage of the book. It is quite obvious that all of Steinbecks characters are