Golden Demon :: essays research papers

The Golden lusus naturae (Response)Golden Demon (Konjiki-yasha) is the most primal work of Koyo Ozaki, who was a pionner in young Japanese literature. Since its publication in the form of a serial story in a chance(a) newspaper, the novel has commanded high opinions, and many films and plays have been made of it. The Golden Demon synopsis is about a penniless drifter loses the woman he loves when her parents arrange her marriage to a rich playboy. Filled with bitterness and despair, the small man devotes his life to acquiring great wealth, which gradually turns him into a unmerciful money lender. In brief, Omiya has a fianc whose name is Kwanichi. They love each separate however, she is loved by a capitalist, and her parents hope her to marriage Tomiyama. And Omiya also was bedazzle by his wealth and married him.The story is talked Kwanichis grudge against her and Omiyas regret about her marriage calmly, plus, it has been continued for six years. The poor misfire, Omiya, co uldnt even die because of her regret feeling. She was still a old-fashioned girl who believed ones fortune, and Kwanichi was simple-minded guy who become a phlebotomise because he was far beneath Mr. Tomiyama in wealth. However kwanichi was not rightfully hero because he was deprived of his fianc and did not try to take her back.In Golden Demon, it lively depicts the live of people struggling and surviving potently despite being tossed about by the quickly changing waves of new society. At the same time, the movie focuses on love and money, which we gouge safely say are universal themes for all human beings.The chronicle is very pre-modern if the modern means the sense of self as unique, thorough subjectivity. Since the narrative oscillates between that of and omniscient third person and emotional soliloquies by Kwanichi, Tomiyama, and especially Omiya, the reader can not see any wind of the boundary between the self and not-self. The narrator is, in this sense, nobody, who is floating in interstices of characters. This was not unusual at all before the modernist period, but it is enkindle that object peoples voices restores the pre-modern type narrative in to the modern period. Does this mean that the social objects have no voice to be represent in modern narrative?Furthermore, in terms of its truth order in reality and self, for example, the value of realist narrative and confessional narrative, it was quite new and the branch to openly mimic Zolaist naturalism.